Mainland China

Contributing law firm: JunHe LLP

YEAR IN REVIEW

(1 July 2024 to 30 June 2025)

  • The Ministry of Finance has issued the Basic Standard for Enterprise Sustainability Disclosure (Trial) and a draft climate disclosure standard, laying the foundations for a unified sustainability disclosure standards system which is expected to be in place by 2030.
  • The standards are designed to deliver functionally-aligned outcomes to those under the ISSB Standards, with adjustments for China’s circumstances. They are currently voluntary, but are expected to shift to a mandatory status on a phased basis (with the timing not yet confirmed).
  • The draft Environment Ecological Protection Code has been released, containing principles to guide companies on their low-carbon transition.

Scroll down or click below for further information on each key theme.

 

PODCAST OVERVIEW

Please click on the podcast above for a snapshot of the three key themes of ESG reporting, transition planning and greenwashing risks in respect of Mainland China. 

KEY CONTACT

Tianling (Carey) Ni
Partner, JunHe LLP

A. ESG Reporting

1. Are there legal or regulatory requirements for companies to make ESG disclosures in your jurisdiction?

Yes.

2. What are the key legislative and regulatory sources for ESG disclosure requirements and to whom do they apply?

In the mainland of China, general ESG disclosure requirements are primarily aimed at listed companies:

  1. Self-regulatory Guidelines of the Shenzhen Stock Exchange for Listed Companies No. 1 - Standardized Operation of Main Board-Listed Companies: (i) require listed companies included in the Shenzhen Stock Exchange 100 Index to disclose their Social Responsibility (SR) reports separately in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Guidelines for Standardized Operation of Listed Companies of the Exchange; and (ii) encourage other companies listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange to disclose their SR reports.
  2. Self-regulatory Guidelines of the Shanghai Stock Exchange for Listed Companies No. 1 - Standardized Operation require (i) companies listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange Corporate Governance Sector, (ii) companies simultaneously listed on both the Shanghai Stock Exchange and other jurisdictions outside the mainland of China, and (iii) financial companies, to disclose their SR reports at the same time as their annual reports. Other companies listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange are encouraged to disclose their SR reports at the same time as their annual reports.
  3. Notice on Conducting Disclosure of 2021 Annual Reports of Listed Companies on the Shanghai Stock Exchange's Sci-Tech Innovation Board (SSE STAR Market) requires SSE STAR Market-listed companies to disclose ESG-related information in their annual reports, and to separately prepare and disclose ESG reports, SR reports, sustainable development reports, environmental responsibility reports, and other documents as appropriate. The companies included in the SSE STAR Market 50 Index should disclose their SR report at the same time as their annual reports; however, those which have already disclosed ESG reports are exempted from separate disclosure of SR reports. Other companies listed on the SSE STAR Market are encouraged to disclose ESG reports or SR reports at the same time as their annual reports. When preparing their ESG reports or SR reports, companies should, as a key focus, disclose actions taken to support the “carbon peak and carbon neutrality” goals and to promote sustainable development.
  4. Self-regulatory Guidelines of the Shenzhen Stock Exchange for Listed Companies No. 17 - Sustainable Development Report (Trial) require listed companies included in the Shenzhen Stock Exchange 100 Index, Growth Enterprise Index, and enterprises simultaneously listed on the Exchanges in China and abroad to disclose sustainability reports that cover typical and more innovative ESG topics.
  5. Self-regulatory Guidelines of the Shanghai Stock Exchange for Listed Companies No. 14 - Sustainable Development Report (Trial) require listed companies included in the Shanghai Stock Exchange 180 Index, STAR 50 Index, and enterprises simultaneously listed on the Exchanges in China and abroad to disclose sustainability reports that cover typical and more innovative ESG topics.
  6. Self-regulatory Guidelines of the Beijing Stock Exchange for Listed Companies No. 11 - Sustainable Development Report (Trial) stipulate similar rules as items (d) and (e) above for Beijing Stock Exchange-listed companies, but they are proposed to be non-mandatory at this stage.

    The new guidelines mentioned in paragraphs (d) and (e) above are termed the “Sustainable Development Report Guidelines” in this chapter.
  7. Measures for Administration of Law-based Disclosure of Environmental Information by Enterprises (the MEE Measures) issued by the Ministry of Ecology and Environment (MEE) stipulate that certain enterprises are subject to mandatory environmental disclosure requirements. These include:

    (i) key pollutant-discharging entities;

    (ii) enterprises subject to compulsory cleaner production audit;

    (iii) listed companies and their subsidiaries at all levels (to the extent consolidated) that are subject to the provisions of Article 8(1) of the MEE Measures (e.g. companies that have breached environmental laws);

    (iv) enterprises issuing enterprise bonds and corporate bonds, and non-financial enterprises issuing debt financing instruments that are subject to the provisions of Article 8 of the MEE Measures; and

    (v) other enterprises that shall disclose environmental information as prescribed by laws and regulations.
  8. Basic Standard for Enterprise Sustainability Disclosure (Trial) (the Basic Standard) issued by the Ministry of Finance sets out general requirements for the disclosure of corporate sustainability information. The Basic Standard was issued in 2024 and is currently voluntary. It stipulates that it will apply to listed companies, other enterprises as required by regulations (which have not yet been issued) and entities that choose to disclose sustainability information voluntarily. The Basic Standard lays the foundation for a national unified sustainability disclosure system which is intended to apply in phases, from listed companies to non-listed companies, and from large enterprises to SMEs.
3. Are the requirements mandatory or do they apply on a comply-or-explain basis?

The disclosure requirements of the Shenzhen Stock Exchange and Shanghai Stock Exchange discussed in section A.2(a), (b) and (c) are mandatory for (i) listed companies included in the Shenzhen Stock Exchange 100 Index, (ii) representative companies listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange Corporate Governance Sector, (iii) Shanghai Stock Exchange-listed financial companies, (iv) companies listed on both the Shanghai Stock Exchange and other jurisdictions outside the mainland of China, and (v) SSE STAR Market-listed companies. They are otherwise voluntary for other listed companies on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange or Shanghai Stock Exchange.

The disclosure requirements under the Sustainable Development Report Guidelines of the Shenzhen Stock Exchange and Shanghai Stock Exchange (as discussed in section A.2(d) and (e) above) are mandatory from 2025 for (i) listed companies included in the Shenzhen Stock Exchange 100 Index, (ii) companies listed on the Growth Enterprise Index, (iii) listed companies included in the Shanghai Stock Exchange 180 Index, (iv) companies listed on the STAR 50 Index, and (v) companies listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange or Shanghai Stock Exchange and other jurisdiction outside the mainland of China. 

The Sustainable Development Report Guidelines stipulate similar rules for companies listed on the Beijing Stock Exchange, but they are proposed to be non-mandatory. There is no indication of when they may become mandatory.

The requirements under the MEE Measures on environmental disclosure are mandatory for certain enterprises as discussed in section A.2.

The Basic Standard is currently implemented by enterprises on a voluntary basis and will gradually shift from voluntary to mandatory disclosure. The timing for mandatory application has not yet been specified.

4. Which aspects of ESG do the requirements focus upon?

Based on the requirements of the Shenzhen Stock Exchange and Shanghai Stock Exchange as discussed in section A.2(a) to (c), various ESG aspects are covered. Specifically for companies listed on the SSE STAR Market, the key focus is on their actions to support the “carbon peak and carbon neutrality” goals and promote sustainable development.

For companies subject to the Sustainable Development Report Guidelines of the Shenzhen Stock Exchange and Shanghai Stock Exchange, various typical and more innovative ESG aspects are covered. The environmental aspect mainly includes climate change (including GHG emissions), pollution, biodiversity and ecosystem, resource use, and circular economy. The social aspect mainly includes rural revitalization and social contribution, innovation and scientific ethics, supply chain and customers, and workers’ rights. The governance aspect mainly includes corporate sustainable development management systems, anti-bribery and anti-unfair competition.

For companies subject to the MEE Measures, the key environmental disclosure aspects include:

  1. basic information of the enterprise (production and environmental protection information);
  2. information on the environmental management of the enterprise;
  3. information on the generation, control and discharge of pollutants;
  4. carbon emission information;
  5. ecological and environmental emergency response information;
  6. information on violation of ecological and environmental laws;
  7. law-based annual disclosure of temporary environmental information; and
  8. other environmental information as prescribed by laws and regulations.

The Basic Standard, which is based on IFRS S1, sets out general requirements for the disclosure of corporate sustainability information and does not cover specific ESG topics. In due course, specific standards will be issued to provide detailed requirements for disclosures on ESG topics. Furthermore, application guidelines will be developed to interpret and refine the Basic Standard and its related specific standards. So far, the Ministry of Finance has issued the Exposure Draft of the Corporate Sustainability Disclosure Standards No. 1 – Climate (Trial) (Draft Climate Standard), which is based on IFRS S2 and covers climate-related disclosures.

5. Are the disclosure requirements based on international standards? If so, which one(s)?

The Basic Standard is highly consistent with IFRS S1 in terms of disclosure structure, (i.e., the four pillars of governance, strategy, risk and opportunity management, and metrics and targets), as well as information quality requirements, including reliability, relevance, comparability, verifiability, understandability, and timeliness. At the same time, it incorporates localised adjustments to reflect China’s national context, including modifications in disclosure objectives and topics, and certain expressions.

China has also released its Draft Climate Standard, which is highly consistent with IFRS S2. It also adopts the four-pillar disclosure framework of IFRS S2 and sets similar requirements for the disclosure of GHG emissions, covering Scopes 1, 2, and 3 GHG. It also requires enterprises to conduct climate scenario analysis, disclose climate-related targets, and disclose their progress towards achieving those targets. 

The other regulatory disclosure requirements do not make any specific reference to international standards. However, based on a recent analysis by China Association for Public Companies, they share some commonalities with IFRS S1 and IFRS S2 in terms of framework structure, basic concepts, disclosure principles, disclosure framework, and disclosure of climate change issues. This is particularly the case for the Sustainable Development Report Guidelines. 

In practice, many companies listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange or Shenzhen Stock Exchange prepare their ESG/SR reports with reference to international standards/frameworks, such as the GRI standards, ISO 26000 and TCFD Recommendations.

6. How do the disclosure requirements approach materiality (e.g. single or double materiality)?

The disclosure requirements of the Shenzhen Stock Exchange and Shanghai Stock Exchange adopt double materiality.

The Basic Standard and Draft Climate Standard also adopt double materiality.

7. Are there requirements for the disclosure of GHG emissions? If so, please specify the scope (e.g. Scope 1, Scope 2 and/or Scope 3), to whom they apply and whether there are requirements on the measurement methodology.

Based on the Sustainable Development Report Guidelines of the Shanghai Stock Exchange and Shenzhen Stock Exchange:

  1. The disclosing entity should account for and disclose the total GHG emissions during the reporting period and convert the emissions of different GHGs into MTCO₂e. The entity should disclose the emissions categorised into Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions, and it is encouraged to disclose Scope 3 emissions for those entities that have the conditions to do so.
  2. The disclosing entity should disclose the standards, methods, assumptions, or calculation tools used to account for GHG emissions, and explain the consolidation methods of the emissions (such as equity proportion, financial control, operational control, etc.). If there are changes in the accounting standards, methods and assumptions etc. during the reporting period, the reasons should be explained and the specific impacts should be disclosed.

On 18 October 2023, the MEE issued the Notice on the Reporting and Verification of Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Enterprises in Certain Key Industries in 2023-2025, which stipulates that key emission enterprises, including those with annual carbon emissions of or above 26,000 tCO₂ in key industries, such as petrochemicals, chemicals, building materials, steel, non-ferrous metals, paper, and civil aviation, are required to report their GHG emissions onto the National Carbon Market Information Network. This notice focuses on designated emission factors relating to manufacturing and operation, encompassing only Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions. The notice outlines the reporting verification methods prescribed by the MEE in the Guidance for Verification of Enterprise Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reporting (Trial).

In addition, the Draft Climate Standard, as currently proposed, will require enterprises to disclose GHG emissions, including Scope 1, Scope 2, and Scope 3 emissions. It will apply to enterprises that are required by law or voluntarily choose to disclose sustainability information. Enterprises must calculate their emissions in accordance with the mainland’s national carbon accounting standards, categorise and disclose their absolute GHG emissions during the reporting period, and convert different types of GHG emissions into metric tons of CO₂ equivalent (tCO₂e). In general (with limited exception for Scope 3 emissions), enterprises must disclose the methodologies, activity data, emission factors, input values, and assumptions used in their calculation, as well as explain any changes and their impacts if such elements are revised.

8. Are there requirements to obtain independent assurance of any ESG disclosures? If so, what is the scope of such requirements? If not, are there plans to introduce such requirements?

There are currently no mandatory requirements to obtain independent assurance of any ESG disclosures, and we are not aware of any plans to introduce such requirements. However, the Sustainable Development Report Guidelines and the Basic Standard encourage disclosing entities to engage third-party institutions to provide assurance/audit for their GHG emissions and other disclosed data.

The Sustainable Development Report Guidelines stipulate that disclosed information should include the independence of the third-party institution, its relationship with the disclosing entity, its experience and qualifications, and the assurance or audit report. The content of the report should include, but is not limited to, the scope of assurance or audit, the standards used, main procedures, methods and limitations, opinions or conclusions, etc.

9. For companies not subject to mandatory or comply-or-explain ESG reporting, are voluntary ESG disclosures customary?

Many listed companies make reference to international standards (such as the GRI standards and ISO 26000) and/or local standards (such as the Guidelines on Sustainability Reporting for Chinese Enterprises (CASS-ESG 6.0), Guidance for Enterprise ESG Disclosure (T/CERDS 2-2022), and Reference ESG Indicator Framework for Listed Companies Controlled by Central State-owned Enterprises) in their ESG reports, even though they are not mandatory.

10. Has your jurisdiction issued or adopted a taxonomy on sustainable activities? Is it mandatory and what is its scope of application?

The International Platform on Sustainable Finance, which was jointly launched by economies including China and the EU, released the Common Ground Taxonomy (CGT). The CGT has been adopted by some financial institutions in China and the EU as reference for determining whether projects satisfy the purpose of sustainable finance when issuing financial products, but it is not mandatory.

On 14 November 2024, China, the EU, and Singapore jointly released the Multi-jurisdiction Common Ground Taxonomy. Building on the original CGT, this new taxonomy aims to enhance the interoperability and alignment of sustainable finance standards across these jurisdictions.

The guidance on “green investment” and the Green Bond Endorsed Projects Catalogue mentioned in section C.2 below apply in the sustainable finance context.

11. Are there plans to adopt or incorporate any (other) international ESG reporting framework (e.g. the ISSB Standards and/or the TNFD)? If so, please give details.

Currently, China has incorporated IFRS S1 and IFRS S2 into its domestic disclosure framework through the Basic Standard and the Draft Climate Standard, but has not yet adopted the TNFD framework.

12. Other upcoming developments / direction of travel

As mentioned above, the national unified sustainability disclosure standards system will consist of the basic standards, specific standards, and application guidelines, and will be implemented in stages. They will initially apply to listed companies, with a gradual extension to non-listed companies and small and medium-sized enterprises.

According to the regulatory roadmap, a series of standards, including the Basic Standard, Draft Climate Standard, and related implementation guidelines will be progressively issued by 2027. A nationally unified sustainability disclosure standards system is expected to be in place by 2030. A timeline for mandatory application has not yet been specified.

Given the long development cycle of the standards system, relevant authorities may, based on practical needs, initially formulate disclosure guidelines and regulatory rules for specific industries or sectors, to be gradually refined and improved in the future.

As of now, China has not enacted mandatory human rights and/or environmental due diligence laws nor has it officially proposed such legislation.

Back to homepage

B. Transition Planning

1. Has your jurisdiction set decarbonisation targets and strategies?

China has set clear decarbonisation targets and strategies. The white paper “China's Policies and Actions on Climate Change” published by the Chinese government details China's national strategies and actions in response to climate change. China has included the reduction of carbon emission intensity as a binding indicator in the national economic and social development plan, and in its “14th Five-Year Plan,” it has set a target of reducing carbon dioxide emissions per unit of GDP by 18% by 2025 compared to 2020.

In addition, China announced new national autonomous contribution targets, striving to reach the peak of its carbon emissions before 2030, and striving to achieve carbon neutrality before 2060. At the same time, China has also set specific targets, such as reducing carbon dioxide emissions per unit of GDP by more than 65% by 2030 compared to 2005, increasing the proportion of non-fossil energy in primary energy consumption to about 25%, and a total installed capacity of wind and solar power of more than 1.2 billion kilowatts.

China is also accelerating the construction of its “1+N” policy system for carbon peak and carbon neutrality, formulating top-level design documents and implementation plans for various fields and industries, clarifying the timetable, roadmap and construction drawings, and comprehensively promoting work in each aspect of carbon peak and carbon neutrality.

2. Are businesses subject to any mandatory carbon pricing or other “polluter pays” instruments (such as ETS, carbon taxes or EPR schemes)? If so, please give details. If not, are there plans to do so?

Yes, there is a mandatory carbon market, which mainly targets high-emission industries and enterprises.

The Chinese government has launched a mandatory carbon trading market (CET) and has established a corresponding regulatory framework. On 4 February 2024, the State Council of China promulgated the “Interim Regulations on the Administration of Carbon Emission Trading”, which is the first specialised regulation in China for combatting climate change and clarifying the market trading system for carbon emission rights. Currently, China's carbon emissions are mainly concentrated in eight key industries: power generation, steel, building materials, non-ferrous metals, petrochemicals, chemicals, papermaking, and aviation, which account for about 75% of the country’s total carbon dioxide emissions. The national carbon emission trading market has so far included more than 2,000 power companies and 1,500 companies in the steel, cement and aluminium smelting sectors, accounting for around 60% of the total national carbon dioxide emissions.

China's ETS is primarily based on free allocation by the MEE. The MEE utilises an industry-based benchmarking method, which is determined by the actual output of enterprises, to carry out the free allocation. The MEE outlines its benchmarking method in policy documents concerning the total volume and distribution of allowances. For instance, the free allocation for the power generation sector is currently determined in accordance with the National Carbon Emission Allowance Total and Allocation Plan for the Power Generation Industry in 2023 and 2024. If the actual emissions of an enterprise are less than its allocated allowances, it can sell its surplus allowances on the CET. Conversely, if the actual emissions exceed the allocation, the enterprise needs to purchase allowances on the CET.

It is anticipated that the national ETS will further expand its coverage to include more industries, i.e. (a) during the “14th Five-Year Plan” period, the cement, civil aviation, and aluminium electrolysis industries are expected to be included; and (b) during the “15th Five-Year Plan” period, the steel, papermaking, glass, petrochemical, and chemical industries are expected to be included in a phased manner. China has not yet introduced carbon taxes or mapped out legislation plans relating to carbon taxes (although there are certain types of taxes which are related to carbon reduction to some extent).

China issued a 2016 framework on EPR schemes, focussing on electronics, packaging, automotives and batteries. Pilot projects have been undertaken, but legislation mandating EPR schemes have not yet been introduced. China, together with the EU, launched the EU-China Roadmap on Circular Economy in 2024. One of the stated goals in the roadmap is to look into enhancing EPR schemes in China for selected products.

3. Are there mandatory requirements for companies to have in place and/or disclose climate-related transition plans? If so, please give details. If not, are there plans for such requirements?

There are no mandatory requirements for companies to have transition plans, but certain disclosure requirements on transition planning apply to certain listed companies.

Based on the latest Sustainable Development Report Guidelines discussed in section A.2(d) and (e), the disclosing company should disclose its transition plans, measures, and progress in response to climate-related risks and opportunities, including, but not limited to, the following content:

  1. the company's adjustments to current and future strategies, business models, and resource allocation in response to climate-related risks and opportunities;
  2. the measures that the company has taken or plans to take to improve production processes and update equipment to directly or indirectly address climate-related risks and opportunities;
  3. the transition plan formulated by the company to cope with climate-related risks and opportunities, and the basic assumptions relied upon in formulating such a plan;
  4. the resources provided by the company for the implementation of the transition plan; and
  5. the progress of the company in implementing the transition plan.

There are plans to require reporting entities, subject to the unified sustainability disclosure system, to disclose the targets they have set or which are mandated by national laws, regulations, or strategic plans, such as GHG emission objectives.

4. Are there mandatory requirements to set, meet and/or disclose climate-related targets? If so, please give details. If not, are there plans for such requirements?

Based on the latest Sustainable Development Report Guidelines and the discussions in section A.2, the disclosing entity should disclose information relating to their GHG emission reduction practices, including participation in various emission reduction mechanisms, emission reduction targets, emission reduction measures (such as management measures, financial investments, technological developments etc.), and their effectiveness.

The disclosing entity should also disclose its registration and trading status within national voluntary GHG emission reduction projects and the China Certified Emission Reduction program (CCER), as well as its registration and trading of emission reductions (if any).

When the disclosing entity includes information in the sustainability report that requires estimations or predictions, such as financial impacts and GHG reduction targets, it should be based on reasonable assumptions and premises, and provide adequate risk warnings for significant factors that may affect the accuracy of such estimations or predictions. If there are significant changes to the assumptions and premises upon which the estimations or predictions are based, they should be disclosed promptly.

If adopted, the Draft Climate Standard would require a reporting entity to disclose the climate-related targets set out in its strategy for managing climate risks and opportunities or as mandated by national laws, regulations, or strategic plans, such as GHG emission objectives. For each target, the entity shall disclose its purpose, the methodology used, the scope of application, the time frame for achievement, the metric(s) used to measure progress, and the applicable reference or baseline. When setting and disclosing these targets, the reporting entity shall take due account of its industry type and prevailing industry practice, disclosing each target both qualitatively and quantitatively. Nevertheless, disclosure may be omitted if the information cannot reasonably be ascertained with the entity’s own resources or if it constitutes state secrets or commercially confidential information.

5. Other upcoming developments / direction of travel

The government is introducing policies to encourage and guide enterprises in low carbon transition, including carbon reduction target responsibility systems and low-carbon city construction plans, etc. Specifically:

  1. on 30 April 2025, the government released the draft Environmental and Ecological Protection Code for public comments. The draft code includes general provisions on green and low-carbon development, including those of energy conservation and low-carbon transition; and
  2. on 30 April 2025, the Ministry of Finance released the Draft Climate Standard for public comments. As outlined above, the standard sets requirements on the disclosure of information, including climate transition and GHG emissions. If the standard is adopted, it will initially be applied on a voluntary basis.

The government continues to develop and introduce regulations on carbon emission, including developing carbon trading markets, conducting further research on expanding the scope of the national carbon trading market to include industries such as steel, petrochemicals, and building materials, and accelerating the preparatory work for the voluntary emission reduction trading market. Positive progress has been made - the MEE has officially released two batches of CCER project methodologies and is promoting a carbon emission verification and reporting system. Further detailed disclosure requirements on carbon emission and relevant transition planning might be considered in the future.

Back to homepage

C. Greenwashing Risks

1. Are there any recent examples of legal proceedings, regulatory actions or investigations against or into greenwashing in your jurisdiction?

There have been no significant examples, but some enterprises were held to have misused “green” information in their advertisements or assisted others in providing false green information, which were considered a violation of relevant laws and regulations.

For example, in September 2020, a printing company in Pingdingshan City, Henan Province, labelled its product with a “China Environmental Labelling” pattern and information on “Green Printing Products”. The printing company's China Environmental Labelling Product Certification Certificate had expired on 18 January 2020. The actions of the printing company constituted false or misleading commercial advertising as stipulated in Article 8 of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and the printing company was fined RMB 200,000.

In addition, in recent regulatory practices, we have also observed some cases in which the authenticity and accuracy of some environment-related corporate statements and claims during marketing and sales activities have raised concerns or have been questioned by local regulatory authorities across China. For example, some imported products with inappropriate carbon neutrality labels or statements are required by the market supervision administration of local governments to be removed from shelves due to violation of relevant provisions of the Advertising Law of the PRC.

In 2024, the Supreme People's Court of China held that an environmental inspection company, as a legal entity possessing valid environmental inspection and testing qualifications, deliberately issued a significant number of false monitoring reports. The company condoned fraudulent practices within its departments, including non-compliance with sampling standards, fabrication of data and records, and explicitly instructed or tacitly consented to the issuance of false monitoring reports. These actions constituted the offence of providing false certification documents under criminal laws. Six senior management personnel and directly responsible individuals from the company were sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment, ranging from nine months to one year and two months. Furthermore, they were prohibited from engaging in environmental monitoring and related professions for three years following the completion of their sentences.

2. Are there any laws or regulations specifically dealing with greenwashing?

The State Administration for Market Regulation and Standardization Administration of the People's Republic of China issued a national standard Terminology for Green Finance (GB/T 45490—2025) on 28 March 2025, which included a definition of greenwashing as: “Economic entities engaging in misleading practices or disseminating false information, thereby exaggerating or making unfounded claims regarding the environmental friendliness of their products, services, policies, and objectives.” There are also some regulations which could be regarded as relating to risk management of greenwashing.

Some relevant guidance on “green investment” exists in the finance industry. For example: (a) the Green Investment Guidelines (For Trial Implementation) issued by the Asset Management Association of China. The guidelines deal with how to make green investments and define the scope of green investments, which should include, but is not limited to, the enhancement of energy efficiency, emission reduction, clean and renewable energies, environmental protection and restoration, and recycle economy, with a focus on environmental protection, low carbon development and recycling, etc.; and (b) the Green Bond Endorsed Projects Catalogue (2021 Edition) jointly announced by the People's Bank of China, the National Development and Reform Commission, and the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC), which outlines projects that can be funded by green bonds.

In addition, the Interim Regulations on the Administration of Carbon Emission Trading (effective from 1 May 2024), which regulate carbon emissions trading in the PRC, specify that key GHG emitting entities shall be responsible for the authenticity of their emission data and liabilities arising from their compliance.

3. What are the likely grounds on which such proceedings, actions or investigations can be instigated?

Likely grounds include:

  1. criminal liabilities arising from the issuance of fraudulent certification documents (constituting criminal offences), including the generation of misleading environmental monitoring reports through the fabrication of inaccurate or deceptive data;
  2. disclosure liabilities under securities laws and regulations, e.g. providing materially false or misleading information in listing documents or other corporate disclosure documents, such as ESG reports or SR reports;
  3. claims in tort/contract for misrepresentation; and
  4. violation of the Advertising Law, the Anti-Unfair Competition Law and/or the Law on the Protection of Consumer Rights and Interests, e.g. deceiving consumers that the products are carbon neutral through misleading commercial advertisements.
4. Other upcoming developments / direction of travel

Although there have been no major greenwashing claims in the mainland of China to date, the risks of greenwashing liabilities are expected to increase as sustainability reporting requirements become more robust and the sense of urgency on sustainability continues to grow.

In particular, the Administrative Measures for Information Disclosure of Listed Companies were  revised in 2025, mandating certain companies listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange and the Shenzhen Stock Exchange to disclose annual sustainability reports from 2026, in accordance with the standards of the Self-regulatory Guidelines of the Shenzhen Stock Exchange for Listed Companies No. 17 - Sustainable Development Report (Trial) and the Self-regulatory Guidelines of the Shanghai Stock Exchange for Listed Companies No. 14 - Sustainable Development Report (Trial) (as outlined in section A.2(d) and (e)). The CSRC will carry out substantive reviews of sustainability reports to ensure that the information contained therein is accurate, complete, reliable, presented in a concise and clear manner, and comprehensible to stakeholders. Additionally, the reports must be free from false information, misleading statements, or material omissions. If the information disclosed in the reports includes false records, misleading statements, or material omissions, then the listed company, its responsible officers and other directly liable individuals, as well as its controlling shareholders and ultimate controllers, may all be subject to substantial fines of up to RMB10 million.

It is worth closely observing how the CSRC will practically implement the review of sustainability reports issued by listed companies in the future.

The Supreme People's Court on the Complete, Accurate and Comprehensive Implementation of the New Development Concept Opinions on Providing Judicial Services for Actively and Steadily Promoting Carbon Neutrality stresses that the courts shall address cases involving disputes over the reporting of GHG emissions in accordance with the law. Where key GHG emitting entities refuse to fulfill their GHG emission reporting obligations, fabricate, conceal, or omit GHG emission data, the courts shall support administrative authorities in making administrative punishment decisions in accordance with the law. If technical service agencies and key GHG emitting entities maliciously collude to fabricate, conceal, or omit GHG emission data, causing damage to others, victims may claim compensation for infringement damages. It may also constitute a criminal offence in accordance with the Interpretation by the Supreme People's Court and the Supreme People's Procuratorate on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in Handling Criminal Cases Involving Environmental Pollution and criminal law of the PRC.

Back to homepage

 

Back to homepage

This material is provided for general information only.
It does not constitute legal or other professional advice.